The Clinical Value of Tumour Markers in Breast Cancer
Joe Duffy Principal Grade Biochemist, St Vincent's University Hospital Dublin and Adjunct Professor,
School of Medicine and Medical Science, University College Dublin
Following the commencement of therapy for advanced disease, it is important to know as quickly as possible if the patient is responding to the treatment. If the patient is benefiting, clearly, treatment should be continued. If, on the other hand, treatment is not effective, an alternative therapy might be given. If an alternative therapy is unavailable, these patients could be willing to participate in clinical trials or they could decide to avoid further therapy.
A convenient and relatively inexpensive approach for helping to establish response is by measuring markers such as CA 15-3 or CEA. Generally, decreasing marker levels correlate with tumour response, while increasing markers levels correlate with tumour regression. According to the EGTM guidelines, markers should be measured prior to every chemotherapy course and at least at three-monthly intervals for patients receiving hormone therapy. The EGTM defines an increase in marker concentration of at least 25% to be significant. It is recommended that such an increase be confirmed with a second specimen obtained within a month. If the increase is confirmed, this provides evidence of progressive disease. Similarly, a confirmed decrease in serum levels of more than 50% was stated to be consistent with tumour regression.
In contrast to the EGTM recommendations, the ASCO guidelines state that neither CA 15-3 nor CEA should be routinely used for monitoring therapy in patients with advanced breast cancer.
Also, according to these guidelines:
“an increase in serum markers without symptoms of progression should prompt a complete work-up to investigate for progression of known disease sites or appearance of new sites”.
Conclusion
It is clear from the above that tumour markers play a key role in the care of patients with breast cancer. Tissue markers such as hormone receptors and HER- 2 are now mandatory in determining prognosis and therapy planning. For post-operative surveillance, serum markers such as CA 15-3 and CEA can be used to detect recurrent or metastatic disease at an early stage. These serum makers can also aid the monitoring of therapy in patients undergoing treatment for advanced disease. Markers are particularly important in monitoring disease that cannot be evaluated by standard radiological criteria (e.g. those with irradiated lesions, pleural effusion, ascites, lytic bone disease and sclerotic bone disease).
Professor Joe Duffy is Principal
Grade Biochemist at St Vincent's
University Hospital, Dublin, and
Adjunct Professor in the School of
Medicine and Medical Science at
University College Dublin. The main
focus of Professor Duffy's research
is novel molecular biomarkers in
breast cancer. For his work,
Professor Duffy has received several
national and international awards.
These include the St Luke's Medal
Lecture and The Conway Review
Medal Lecture of the Royal
Academy of Medicine in Ireland and
the National Biochemistry Award
Medal Lecture of the Royal Irish
Academy. Professor Duffy is a
member of a number of
International Expert Panels for the
preparation of guidelines on the
clinical use of tumour markers,
including the European Group on
Tumour Markers (EGTM) and the
National Academy of Clinical
Biochemistry (NACB). He is currently
Chairman of the NACB Panel for
guidelines on the use of biomarkers
in breast cancer. Professor Duffy
obtained his BSc Hons in
biochemistry from the National
University of Ireland, Galway, and
his PhD from the University of
Manchester.
Send Article Feedback
Add me to mailing list
I Agree to terms and conditions
Order Reprint
Order high-quality repints of any articles on this website